QUESTION:
How will the new language on labels for synthetic pyrethroid products like Suspend and Tempo affect the way perimeter treatments are performed? Will these new restrictions apply to products like Termidor SC when used for the control of ants?
ANSWER:
This has been a worrisome issue. The background on this is that it seems to have begun in California, which has the pleasure of holding more environmental groups than any other state. There is a constant worry about the quality of water, not only groundwater that may end up as drinking water, but also general waterways such as lakes or creeks, and the possible effect of pesticides on the living organisms in those waters. Synthetic pyrethroids have long been known to be highly toxic to many kinds of cold blooded animals (fish, reptiles) as well as to arthropods and other invertebrates. For purposes of the studies on pyrethroids in waterways I believe the most sensitive organism possible was chosen as the signal organism, and this is some microscopic invertebrate that may be sensitive to the presence of pyrethroids at even parts per TRILLION, which is extraordinary.
For years sampling of runoff water in storm drains has been done, testing for the presence of pesticides, and in particular pyrethroids. This may be due not only to their particular toxicity to the test organisms, but also because pyrethroids have become the most popular products in use today for insect pest control. I suppose I should keep my editorial comments to myself, but having poor common sense I’ll suggest that anti-pesticide groups are always going to go after the biggest fish in the pond, and these attacks on pyrethroids were expected. Witness the past history against DDT, chordane, and methyl bromide as examples. With respect to fipronil (Termidor), yes we should be worried because that will be next and it already has been spoken of because of its popularity for ant control.
The label changes are going into effect now, as each manufacturer of a pyrethroid product produces their next batch of the product. While CDPR in California initiated this movement the EPA agreed with its need, so EPA requires these label changes on all pyrethroid products. It will be VERY important for you, the PMP, to carefully read the Label for the products you use to compare the wording with what you may be used to. Of course, this has always been a good idea to read the full Label each time.
From what I can determine the majority of the “new” wording on pyrethroid labels is simply new emphasis on what we ought to be doing anyhow. The whole point is to reduce the amount of insecticide that runs off of a property that you have treated and ends up in a gutter and thus the local storm drain and thus the local creek, which then flows to a lake or the main rivers, carrying any pesticide with it. The new Label statements are primarily aimed at clearly stating things such as “sweep any product that lands on a sidewalk back onto the treated area” and “do not water to the point of runoff” and “application is prohibited directly into sewers”. Gee, these would seem like such common sense procedures that any professional should already understand their importance, but I have actually had licensed professionals ask me how to prevent staining from insecticide granules that landed on top of a car!! Uh………gosh……… maybe don’t granulate the top of the car?
Nearly all of the new wording on pyrethroid labels is in the “Environmental Hazards” and the “Applications for Use” sections, and involves statements such as those above. However, a second issue is rearing its ugly head, and this is in place in California and I believe in New York, and that is the use of pyrethroids on any area where runoff into waterways or habitats of endangered or threatened species could possibly occur. This one is much more troublesome, as it is extremely vague, and now your knowledge of the environmental concerns in your area will need to be sharpened. The labels may prohibit applications of pyrethroids within 100 feet of certain kinds of waterways, and this could really limit their use on some properties.
So, look for the changes on the Labels of the products you use and carefully read the label on the package you buy to be certain whether the updates are there or not. And, at this moment in time non-pyrethroids like fipronil are not on the hook too, but likely will be the next target. Our best way to minimize drastic restrictions on fipronil or any other pesticide is to use them ONLY according to the label and the allowances we currently have. Do you think anyone in our industry is spraying Termidor on areas well beyond the distance from a structure allowed by the Label? I suspect they are, and that kind of misuse will doom us all. The reason the new pyrethroid labeling is going into effect is because of sloppy use of the products, allowing the active ingredients to wash into gutters and local creeks.
View past Ask Mr. Pest Control questions.