Archive for July, 2012

Jul 6, 2012 – Bat Battles

QUESTION:

What time of year can bats be removed in California?

ANSWER:

This is going to depend somewhat on the species of the bat, but in general bats seem to give birth anywhere from May to early July, so definitely right now would not be a good time to exclude the adult bats if you are dealing with a structural infestation. Bats are not always protected animals, but given the benefit they provide when living outside where they belong they should be preserved if at all possible. Excluding the adults while the young are still inside a structure and unable to leave is, obviously, going to result in the death of those young, and beyond just the tragic loss this causes it also leads to inside problems with odors, flies, and other things associated with a dead animal. 

From resources I have it then appears that you cannot count on young bats being able to leave on their own any sooner than at least 6 weeks after they are born. One western species takes 6 weeks to mature to the point it can fly. Another common California species can fly at 3 to 4 weeks but will continue to nurse for another several weeks. Mexican free-tailed bats in California are one of our most common species, and their young are born from June into July, meaning it may not be until late August when you can be fairly certain these young are capable of getting out of that structure on their own. 
So, at least at this date it would be improper to seal up a structure if bats may have been producing offspring within it. From state to state this also is going to vary as bats may breed later in cooler northern regions or sooner in the southern states. Checking with your local University Extension office should provide some good information local to you on this. 

View past Ask Mr. Pest Control questions.

Jul 7, 2012 – There’s A New Moth In Town

QUESTION:

I have been treating a lot of webbing clothes moth jobs lately and there seems to be a surge of them for some reason. Any ideas why? There also is a new moth ID’d as a brown house moth. I was told it is a new pest to the area. What can you enlighten me with about this moth? I was told a total fumigation needs to be performed to eradicate this pest.
Thanks – knowledge is a wonderful thing.


ANSWER:

Well Bill, first I’d like to comment on your final thought, and agree that we should never stop learning. This is one reason this industry is so fascinating, as new pests and new ideas come along all the time, and since our business is Customer Service the more we know about our jobs and our industry the better we can Serve the Customer. And, this also allows us to help THEM to understand our business accurately, rather than the load of inaccurate stuff available on the internet and from biased media sources. 

First on the clothes moth. It’s always hard to know why any pest has these surges and declines in their abundance. Outdoors we can take the easy road and blame the weather, but this often is a causal factor when we have excessive rains or drought, a really cold, long winter or a mild one and an early spring. Overwintering bugs are going to react to these changes from “normal”, as are the things they feed on. Indoors it may be harder to find the reason, just as we saw with the difficulty of pinning down the exact reason(s) for the upsurge in Bed Bugs in the last 10 years. Maybe one reason is the same for both, and that could be the reduced use of insecticides indoors, enabling these bugs that might have been killed in the past to survive and reproduce more readily. Perhaps there is some increase in the use of wool fibers for clothing or blankets, or some other materials that these moths would eat, giving them more opportunities to do well indoors. Looking for that cause would be interesting for you. 
The Brown House Moth – Hoffmanophila pseudospretella – has actually been present in North America for probably a hundred years or longer and it is a much more common moth in Europe. In addition to various bits of organic debris that may be eaten it also will feed on stored food products such as dry pet foods, cereals, baking mixes, and grains such as rice or corn. I also may feed on animal products like the typical clothes moths do, so fur, feathers, and woolen materials as well as leftover stuff in animal nests and bird nests. Clearly this is a pretty diverse moth, and this leads to some difficulty in controlling it because finding and dealing with the SOURCE is necessary. I think fumigation would be an extreme measure to go to, but if the most thorough search and inspection you can do does not turn up that source then fumigating the whole structure certainly would kill them.
The problem with fumigation is that it does nothing to eliminate the contributing condition, which is some acceptable food material that these moths have discovered indoors and whose larvae are now busy eating (a.k.a. “recycling”) that material. If that material is still there other moths or carpet beetles will eventually find it too and the problem can start up once more. Try to narrow down where the moths are being found most commonly in the structure and then start with the easy things first – clothes and blankets, stored food products, and then progress to the attic for a look for animal nests. It could be that something died in a wall void or an inaccessible place in the attic and you are not going to be able to remove it, but more often it will be something in a place where it can be found and disposed of. 

 

View past Ask Mr. Pest Control questions.

Stink Bugs Causing Crisis, Leaving Foul Odor Across Nation

One report given to the House of Representatives states that the are “causing significant damage to agricultural products, particularly the apple crop in mid-Atlantic states.” That damage comes to a total loss of $40 million per year, experts say.

View complete article

Southwest Michigan fruit update: Blueberry harvest under way; new invasive … – Michigan Business Review – MLive.com


Michigan Business Review – MLive.com

Southwest Michigan fruit update: Blueberry harvest under way; new invasive
Michigan Business Review – MLive.com
KALAMAZOO, MI – Blueberry harvest is moving quickly, and a new invasive pest has been sighted in low numbers in Michigan, according to the weekly report by Michigan State University extension educators Mark Longstroth, Bill Shane and Diane Brown.

View complete article

Jul 4, 2012 – Interpreting Pyrethroid Labeling

QUESTION:

I first want to say that I am enjoying the updates to the Master Technician series. Thank you for your vigilance in making this a current resource. Next, my question. With the change in the labeling for synthetic pyrethroids I need to confirm or maybe update my understanding of spot treatments. I have a long history in the industry and in the past I believe it was acceptable to string spot applications side-by-side together, relying on an accepted not-to-exceed percentage of a given surface of the application. At this point, I have a concern with the validity of the spot treatment percentage issue and the demands of the new labeling. Specifically, the limitations for use around the exterior of the home at windows and doorways.
My question is this: Is it currently considered a compliant application if spot treatments are attached side-by-side as long as the areas of the spots combined does not exceed a certain percentage of the given surface? Thank you for your input on this concern.

ANSWER:

Good morning Eddie, and thank you for the compliments. I see you are in Colorado, so I hope you and your home are safe from the awful fires. 

We discussed this “spot” treatment definition in the past, and you and I have the same memory that there was always a limitation on how much of the overall area could be covered with “spots”. The EPA definition of a spot is quite clear – “no individual spot may exceed 2 square feet”. However, with this new pyrethroid labeling I spent quite awhile trying to find out if there was any more to this, and apparently there is not. The dimension of that “spot” are not defined, so I suppose it could be a spot 1 foot wide by 2 feet long, or 6 inches wide by 4 feet long, or to be silly about it a spot 2 inches wide and 12 feet long – all of these add up to 288 square inches, which is 2 square feet. We should use good common sense on this part. 
But, the EPA does not state anything further, so our memory of being told that we could cover “no more than 20%” of an overall surface with spots seems to have been fabricated by someone. However, I have seen, on a couple of product labels, the instruction that no more than a specific percentage of the overall surface could be covered by spots, so for those specific products the label must be followed, and this emphasizes why it is so important to carefully read every word on every product label before we use it. I have talked with state regulators, NPMP specialists, and they have talked with EPA, and the consensus seems to be that there is no mention of how close together we can place the spots or how much of the overall surface can be covered with spots.
So, this unfortunate vagueness leads to problems, because now everyone has the liberty of making their own decision, which probably is not in the spirit of this whole issue and the requirement to place only small spots of pesticide on any surface. I suppose that legally it could be as you suggest, that as long as you interrupt the application of the spray after every 2 square feet is covered you could just put all the spots adjacent and end to end, ultimately ending up with the whole surface covered. Clearly this is not in the spirit of the law on spot treatments, but would just be taking advantage of, perhaps, an oversight by the EPA on this definition (which, by the way, is DECADES old). 
For this reason I always encourage technicians to open a dialogue with their local regulatory agency, and ask those folks exactly how THEY interpret this law in their jurisdiction. They may have a very concise opinion that you must follow. With respect to the new pyrethroid labeling and treatments around doors and windows, the EPA did work with California’s CDPR to state that the application of a “pin stream” around doors and windows, where no true crack or crevice exists, would be defined as a surface treatment with a 1 inch wide band, and that this would be in compliance with the new labeling. EPA states that this kind of treatment would fall within their “exceptions” for either C&C or Spot treatments. 
So, in summary, EPA at this time does NOT address how much overall surface can be treated with spots, but does clearly define a “spot”. Good common sense by our industry has to come into play as well as working with local regulators. All of the updated Pyrethroids information is on PestWeb in our “Industry / PestWeb Features” resource. Nice to talk with you Eddie. 

View past Ask Mr. Pest Control questions.

controllers called in over rat infestation at city hospital

“This is not the sort of thing that should be happening at a hospital in the 21st century.” teams have been called in to handle the outbreak at the hospital, where hundreds of patients, including many children and elderly people, are treated every day.

View complete article

Pittsgrove Township Environmental Commission program focuses on invasive in South Jersey forests

PITTSGROVE TWP. — The Pittsgrove Township Committee and the Pittsgrove Township Environmental Commission host a presentation and discussion on “Invasive Forest ” that are affecting the pristine woodlands of Southern New Jersey.

View complete article

flourish after heavy rain

Pasco residents could still be buzzing about Tropical Storm Debby this week as mosquitoes hatch from breeding grounds in standing water. “It’s a lot more rain than we’re used to this time of the year,” Pasco Mosquito Control District Director …

View complete article

Research Shows July Through September Peak Season for Bed Bugs – PCT Magazine

Research Shows July Through September Peak Season for Bed Bugs
PCT Magazine
The report was conducted by BedBug Central Technical Director Jeffrey White, who reviewed the number of initial bed bug services submitted by select pest management companies throughout five regions of the country beginning January 2008 through April
Bed Bug Advisory: Optical Chemical Reaches Out to Bed Bug Sufferers, Hotel Albany Times Union

all 7 news articles »

View complete article

Mosquito abatement program successful in Moffat County – Craig Daily Press

Mosquito abatement program successful in Moffat County
Craig Daily Press
Gary Brannan, Moffat County weed and pest management manager, and Pam Boyd, pest control technician, examine the results of two mosquito abatement tests conducted in Moffat County earlier this week. The department utilizes a variety of mosquito

View complete article

« Older Entries Newer Entries »